JHMM vs QQQ: Holdings Overlap
JHMMJohn Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
John Hancock · 666 holdings · $6.0B · as of 2026-03-31
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Invesco · 101 holdings · $479.2B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are JHMM and QQQ?
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM, by John Hancock) holds 666 positions; Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10JHMM holds 666 · QQQ holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- JHMM 2%·QQQ 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in JHMM
656 of 666 positions (97.5% of the fund) are not held by QQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | JHMM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 13.9% | 49.7% |
| Industrials | 20.0% | 4.2% |
| Communication Services | 2.8% | 16.0% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 0.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 12.6% |
| Other Sectors | 37.7% | 17.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHMM | +3.3% | +17.3% | +24.7% | +15.8% | +8.8% | +11.9% | 0.86% |
| QQQ | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.6% | +25.2% | +15.2% | +20.8% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in JHMM vs QQQ →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by FANG, MPWR and TTWO.
 FANGDiamondback Energy Inc COM | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc. COM | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
 TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software Inc. COM | 0.30% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 GEHCGE Healthcare Technologies Inc. COMMON STOCK | 0.23% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Class A | 0.27% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 INSMInsmed Inc COM PAR $.01 | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.16% |
 VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc., Class A | 0.22% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 DXCMDexCom Inc COM | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
 CSGPCostar Group Inc COM | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.06% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 0.06% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do JHMM and QQQ overlap?
JHMM and QQQ overlap by 1.7% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (JHMM holds 666 positions and QQQ holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both JHMM and QQQ?
The two portfolios are 1.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of JHMM and QQQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are FANG, MPWR, TTWO, GEHC and CTSH. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does JHMM own that QQQ doesn't?
656 positions (97.5% of JHMM) are unique to JHMM, led by TRGP, KEYS and FIX. In the other direction, 91 positions (98.0% of QQQ) are unique to QQQ.