JHMM vs VB: Holdings Overlap
JHMMJohn Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
John Hancock · 666 holdings · $6.0B · as of 2026-03-31
VBVanguard Small-cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 1312 holdings · $82.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are JHMM and VB?
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM, by John Hancock) holds 666 positions; Vanguard Small-cap Index Fund (VB, by Vanguard) holds 1312. They have 509 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 58.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 58.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 509JHMM holds 666 · VB holds 1312
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- JHMM 66%·VB 71%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in JHMM
157 of 666 positions (33.8% of the fund) are not held by VB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VB
803 of 1312 positions (28.9% of the fund) are not held by JHMM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | JHMM | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 20.0% | 21.2% |
| Financials | 15.5% | 13.4% |
| Information Technology | 13.9% | 13.8% |
| Health Care | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 10.5% |
| Other Sectors | 29.8% | 28.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of JHMM, 1% of VB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHMM | +3.3% | +17.3% | +24.7% | +15.8% | +8.8% | +11.9% | 0.86% |
| VB | +2.5% | +19.5% | +29.1% | +15.9% | +8.1% | +11.3% | 1.18% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in JHMM vs VB →
Shared Holdings(509)
The top 10 shared positions account for 6% of the overlap, led by CIEN, EME and UTHR.
0.47% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 0.46% | 0.37% | |
0.39% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.37% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.50% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.39% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 0.39% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.40% | 0.33% | |
0.36% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 0.37% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.43% | 0.32% | |
0.44% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.38% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.35% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.37% | 0.28% | |
0.36% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.30% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.30% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.28% | 0.26% | |
0.24% | 0.30% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.25% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.35% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.25% | 0.24% | |
0.31% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Showing the top 250 of 509 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do JHMM and VB overlap?
JHMM and VB overlap by 58.9% of portfolio weight. They share 509 holdings (JHMM holds 666 positions and VB holds 1312), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both JHMM and VB?
The two portfolios are 58.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of JHMM and VB?
The largest positions held by both funds are CIEN, EME, UTHR, LITE and FIX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 6% of the total overlap.
What does JHMM own that VB doesn't?
157 positions (33.8% of JHMM) are unique to JHMM, led by TRGP, KEYS and ETR. In the other direction, 803 positions (28.9% of VB) are unique to VB.