JQUA vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (JQUA: 2026-04-30, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are JQUA and KOMP?
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 67 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 67JQUA holds 289 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- JQUA 34%·KOMP 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in JQUA
222 of 289 positions (65.5% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
434 of 501 positions (85.0% of the fund) are not held by JQUA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | JQUA | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.8% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 10.0% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 8.5% | 12.4% |
| Financials | 12.4% | 1.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 21.6% | 9.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of JQUA, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in JQUA vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(67)
The top 10 shared positions account for 38% of the overlap, led by NVDA, META and KLAC.
2.05% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
1.71% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.89% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.45% | 0.46% | 0.45% | |
1.61% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.44% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.21% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.32% | 0.34% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 0.42% | 0.31% | |
0.32% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.30% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.11% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.61% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.66% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.79% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.40% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.08% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.26% | 0.19% | |
0.71% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.24% | 0.19% | |
0.39% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.24% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.99% | 0.18% | |
0.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.34% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do JQUA and KOMP overlap?
JQUA and KOMP overlap by 11.8% of portfolio weight. They share 67 holdings (JQUA holds 289 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both JQUA and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 11.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of JQUA and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, META, KLAC, ON and MU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 38% of the total overlap.
What does JQUA own that KOMP doesn't?
222 positions (65.5% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA, led by GOOGL, XOM and BRK-B. In the other direction, 434 positions (85.0% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.