JQUA vs OMFL: Holdings Overlap
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Invesco · 478 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (JQUA: 2026-04-30, OMFL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are JQUA and OMFL?
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289 positions; Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL, by Invesco) holds 478. They have 215 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 47.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 47.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 215JQUA holds 289 · OMFL holds 478
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- JQUA 85%·OMFL 79%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in JQUA
74 of 289 positions (14.4% of the fund) are not held by OMFL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | JQUA | OMFL |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.8% | 33.6% |
| Financials | 12.4% | 11.1% |
| Communication Services | 6.8% | 11.2% |
| Industrials | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Health Care | 8.5% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 24.4% | 24.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
| OMFL | +3.5% | +17.0% | +23.0% | +13.4% | +9.8% | — | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in JQUA vs OMFL →
Shared Holdings(215)
The top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, NVDA and AAPL.
2.35% | 4.38% | 2.35% | |
2.05% | 5.05% | 2.05% | |
2.01% | 8.57% | 2.01% | |
1.71% | 1.84% | 1.71% | |
1.70% | 2.59% | 1.70% | |
1.66% | 3.14% | 1.66% | |
1.61% | 2.37% | 1.61% | |
1.77% | 1.54% | 1.54% | |
1.44% | 1.34% | 1.34% | |
1.25% | 1.76% | 1.25% | |
1.15% | 2.17% | 1.15% | |
1.11% | 1.19% | 1.11% | |
0.94% | 1.03% | 0.94% | |
0.89% | 0.97% | 0.89% | |
2.11% | 0.86% | 0.86% | |
1.21% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
0.79% | 2.75% | 0.79% | |
0.75% | 1.91% | 0.75% | |
0.75% | 0.77% | 0.75% | |
1.70% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.67% | 1.11% | 0.67% | |
1.08% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.53% | 1.72% | 0.53% | |
1.15% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.46% | 1.14% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do JQUA and OMFL overlap?
JQUA and OMFL overlap by 47.9% of portfolio weight. They share 215 holdings (JQUA holds 289 positions and OMFL holds 478), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both JQUA and OMFL?
The two portfolios are 47.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of JQUA and OMFL?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, NVDA, AAPL, META and V. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the total overlap.
What does JQUA own that OMFL doesn't?
74 positions (14.4% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA, led by HD, SNDK and CIEN. In the other direction, 263 positions (21.2% of OMFL) are unique to OMFL.