KOMP vs IGM: Holdings Overlap
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (KOMP: 2026-08-06, IGM: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KOMP and IGM?
State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501 positions; iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288. They have 111 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 111KOMP holds 501 · IGM holds 288
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KOMP 27%·IGM 64%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KOMP
390 of 501 positions (72.7% of the fund) are not held by IGM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KOMP | IGM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 82.6% |
| Industrials | 27.4% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 3.6% | 17.1% |
| Health Care | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.3% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 14.3% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (14% of KOMP, 0% of IGM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KOMP vs IGM →
Shared Holdings(111)
The top 10 shared positions account for 39% of the overlap, led by NVDA, META and KLAC.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 0.77% | 8.44% | 0.77% |
|---|---|---|---|
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 0.63% | 4.17% | 0.63% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.55% | 1.27% | 0.55% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 0.40% | 2.51% | 0.40% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 0.37% | 2.02% | 0.37% |
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 0.42% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 COHRCoherent Corp COM | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
 NOWServicenow Inc COM | 0.27% | 0.72% | 0.27% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 0.24% | 1.79% | 0.24% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 0.22% | 3.73% | 0.22% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 0.21% | 0.85% | 0.21% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 0.21% | 8.23% | 0.21% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM Inc. COM | 0.21% | 0.91% | 0.21% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 0.20% | 0.65% | 0.20% |
 APHAmphenol Corporation CL A | 0.19% | 1.02% | 0.19% |
 TELTE Connectivity PLC ORD SHS | 0.19% | 0.40% | 0.19% |
 TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc COM | 0.65% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 TERTeradyne Inc. COM | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.19% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 0.18% | 0.34% | 0.18% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.18% |
 ONON Semiconductor Corp. COM | 0.46% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 ADIAnalog Devices Inc. COM | 0.15% | 1.03% | 0.15% |
 ZMZoom Communications, Inc., Class A | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
 FSLRFirst Solar Inc COM | 0.24% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KOMP and IGM overlap?
KOMP and IGM overlap by 10.5% of portfolio weight. They share 111 holdings (KOMP holds 501 positions and IGM holds 288), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KOMP and IGM?
The two portfolios are 10.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KOMP and IGM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, META, KLAC, MU and CSCO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 39% of the total overlap.
What does KOMP own that IGM doesn't?
390 positions (72.7% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP, led by DDD, TWST and ESLT. In the other direction, 177 positions (36.2% of IGM) are unique to IGM.