KOMP vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (KOMP: 2026-08-06, LIT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KOMP and LIT?
State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3KOMP holds 501 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KOMP 1%·LIT 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KOMP
498 of 501 positions (98.6% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LIT
38 of 41 positions (93.5% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KOMP | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 2.5% | 41.6% |
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 13.8% |
| Industrials | 27.4% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.3% | 9.6% |
| Other Sectors | 9.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 14.3% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (14% of KOMP, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KOMP vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by TSLA, LCID and SQM.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KOMP and LIT overlap?
KOMP and LIT overlap by 1.0% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (KOMP holds 501 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KOMP and LIT?
The two portfolios are 1.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KOMP and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSLA, LCID and SQM. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does KOMP own that LIT doesn't?
498 positions (98.6% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP, led by DDD, TWST and ESLT. In the other direction, 38 positions (93.5% of LIT) are unique to LIT.