KOMP vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (KOMP: 2026-08-06, MCHI: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KOMP and MCHI?
State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2KOMP holds 501 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KOMP 0%·MCHI 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KOMP
499 of 501 positions (99.8% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MCHI
578 of 580 positions (99.3% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KOMP | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 7.8% |
| Industrials | 27.4% | 1.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.3% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 3.6% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 1.8% | 14.8% |
| Other Sectors | 18.6% | 8.5% |
| Unclassified | 14.3% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (14% of KOMP, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KOMP vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(2)
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KOMP and MCHI overlap?
KOMP and MCHI overlap by 0.1% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (KOMP holds 501 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KOMP and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 0.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KOMP and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are LEGN and TME. Together the top 2 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does KOMP own that MCHI doesn't?
499 positions (99.8% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP, led by DDD, TWST and ESLT. In the other direction, 578 positions (99.3% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.