KOMP vs PHO: Holdings Overlap
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF
Invesco · 36 holdings · $2.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (KOMP: 2026-08-06, PHO: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KOMP and PHO?
State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501 positions; Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO, by Invesco) holds 36. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13KOMP holds 501 · PHO holds 36
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KOMP 2%·PHO 37%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KOMP
488 of 501 positions (98.0% of the fund) are not held by PHO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KOMP | PHO |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 27.4% | 55.4% |
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 13.0% |
| Utilities | 1.9% | 12.8% |
| Health Care | 12.4% | 8.2% |
| Materials | 2.5% | 8.1% |
| Other Sectors | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 14.3% | 2.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (14% of KOMP, 2% of PHO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
| PHO | +5.7% | +4.5% | +3.2% | +8.8% | +5.6% | +12.2% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KOMP vs PHO →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by VMI, LNN and ITRI.
0.33% | 2.58% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 0.44% | 0.30% | |
0.16% | 2.70% | 0.16% | |
0.14% | 3.21% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 3.83% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 1.78% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 3.85% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 3.44% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.98% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.26% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 8.57% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 1.17% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 3.93% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KOMP and PHO overlap?
KOMP and PHO overlap by 1.9% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (KOMP holds 501 positions and PHO holds 36), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KOMP and PHO?
The two portfolios are 1.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KOMP and PHO?
The largest positions held by both funds are VMI, LNN, ITRI, TTEK and VLTO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does KOMP own that PHO doesn't?
488 positions (98.0% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP, led by DDD, TWST and ESLT. In the other direction, 23 positions (63.3% of PHO) are unique to PHO.