KRE vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
KREState Street® SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 158 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (KRE: 2026-08-06, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KRE and ONEQ?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF (KRE, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 158 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 61 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 61KRE holds 158 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KRE 47%·ONEQ 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KRE
97 of 158 positions (52.1% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KRE | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 97.7% | 2.8% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Unclassified | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of KRE, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRE | +1.5% | +19.0% | +32.6% | +19.1% | +5.9% | +9.0% | 2.10% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KRE vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(61)
The top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the overlap, led by HBAN, EWBC and WTFC.
1.28% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.28% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.28% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.36% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.41% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.37% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.28% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.37% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.34% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.35% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.58% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.35% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.27% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.09% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.36% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.81% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.32% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.42% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.75% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.24% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.76% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.98% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.26% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.87% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KRE and ONEQ overlap?
KRE and ONEQ overlap by 0.8% of portfolio weight. They share 61 holdings (KRE holds 158 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KRE and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 0.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KRE and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are HBAN, EWBC, WTFC, ONB and BPOP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the total overlap.
What does KRE own that ONEQ doesn't?
97 positions (52.1% of KRE) are unique to KRE, led by CFR, PNFP and HOMB. In the other direction, 961 positions (98.7% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.