KRE vs REGL: Holdings Overlap
KREState Street® SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 158 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
REGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 65 holdings · $1.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (KRE: 2026-08-06, REGL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KRE and REGL?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF (KRE, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 158 positions; ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL, by ProShares) holds 65. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9KRE holds 158 · REGL holds 65
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KRE 11%·REGL 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KRE
149 of 158 positions (88.2% of the fund) are not held by REGL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KRE | REGL |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 97.7% | 30.9% |
| Utilities | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 13.6% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 13.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 17.2% |
| Unclassified | 1.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of KRE, 0% of REGL).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRE | +1.5% | +19.0% | +32.6% | +19.1% | +5.9% | +9.0% | 2.10% |
| REGL | +3.7% | +14.8% | +18.4% | +12.5% | +8.5% | +9.8% | 2.13% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KRE vs REGL →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CFR, HOMB and UMBF.
1.42% | 1.49% | 1.42% | |
1.39% | 1.56% | 1.39% | |
1.37% | 1.68% | 1.37% | |
1.35% | 1.62% | 1.35% | |
1.35% | 1.56% | 1.35% | |
1.30% | 1.56% | 1.30% | |
1.26% | 1.57% | 1.26% | |
0.81% | 1.59% | 0.81% | |
0.75% | 1.59% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KRE and REGL overlap?
KRE and REGL overlap by 11.0% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (KRE holds 158 positions and REGL holds 65), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KRE and REGL?
The two portfolios are 11.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KRE and REGL?
The largest positions held by both funds are CFR, HOMB, UMBF, CBSH and UBSI. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does KRE own that REGL doesn't?
149 positions (88.2% of KRE) are unique to KRE, led by PNFP, BPOP and SSB. In the other direction, 56 positions (85.5% of REGL) are unique to REGL.