KRE vs VTWO: Holdings Overlap
KREState Street® SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 158 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
VTWOVanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Vanguard · 1952 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (KRE: 2026-08-06, VTWO: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KRE and VTWO?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF (KRE, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 158 positions; Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund (VTWO, by Vanguard) holds 1952. They have 133 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 133KRE holds 158 · VTWO holds 1952
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KRE 69%·VTWO 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KRE
25 of 158 positions (30.5% of the fund) are not held by VTWO.
Only in VTWO
1819 of 1952 positions (91.7% of the fund) are not held by KRE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KRE | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 97.7% | 14.3% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 19.4% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 17.8% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 20.8% |
| Unclassified | 1.5% | 4.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of KRE, 5% of VTWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRE | +1.5% | +19.0% | +32.6% | +19.1% | +5.9% | +9.0% | 2.10% |
| VTWO | +1.8% | +23.1% | +38.8% | +17.3% | +7.7% | +11.0% | 1.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KRE vs VTWO →
Shared Holdings(133)
The top 10 shared positions account for 23% of the overlap, led by UMBF, ONB and VLY.
1.37% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.36% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.27% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.35% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.36% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.27% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.34% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.39% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.21% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.36% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.81% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.24% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.32% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.22% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.34% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.91% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.76% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.87% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.75% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.90% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.98% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.76% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.14% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.09% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KRE and VTWO overlap?
KRE and VTWO overlap by 8.0% of portfolio weight. They share 133 holdings (KRE holds 158 positions and VTWO holds 1952), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KRE and VTWO?
The two portfolios are 8.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KRE and VTWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are UMBF, ONB, VLY, GBCI and UBSI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 23% of the total overlap.
What does KRE own that VTWO doesn't?
25 positions (30.5% of KRE) are unique to KRE, led by CFR, PNFP and BPOP. In the other direction, 1819 positions (91.7% of VTWO) are unique to VTWO.