LIT vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are LIT and SCZ?
Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8LIT holds 41 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- LIT 10%·SCZ 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in LIT
33 of 41 positions (90.2% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in LIT vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by PLS, MIN and IGO.
 PLSPLS Group Ltd | 4.00% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MINMineral Resources Ltd | 2.32% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 IGOIGO Ltd | 1.08% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 LTRLiontown Ltd | 1.03% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 ELVElevra Lithium Ltd | 0.43% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 AMGAMG Critical Materials NV | 0.38% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 VULVulcan Energy Resources Ltd | 0.27% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 ERAEramet SA | 0.18% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do LIT and SCZ overlap?
LIT and SCZ overlap by 0.9% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (LIT holds 41 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both LIT and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 0.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of LIT and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are PLS, MIN, IGO, LTR and ELV. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does LIT own that SCZ doesn't?
33 positions (90.2% of LIT) are unique to LIT, led by RIO, 006400 and ALB. In the other direction, 2036 positions (98.4% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.