LIT vs SPDW: Holdings Overlap
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
SPDWState Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 2342 holdings · $40.5B · as of 2026-08-04
Holdings snapshots are 96 days apart (LIT: 2026-04-30, SPDW: 2026-08-04). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are LIT and SPDW?
Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41 positions; State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 2342. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10LIT holds 41 · SPDW holds 2342
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- LIT 27%·SPDW 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in LIT
31 of 41 positions (72.5% of the fund) are not held by SPDW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | LIT | SPDW |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 41.6% | 5.9% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.9% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 12.6% |
| Industrials | 8.5% | 13.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 5.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 22.4% |
| Unclassified | 26.3% | 17.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (26% of LIT, 18% of SPDW).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
| SPDW | +3.1% | +17.9% | +30.1% | +19.9% | +10.1% | +10.3% | 2.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in LIT vs SPDW →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 6752, 6762 and 006400.
 6752Panasonic Holdings Corporation COMMON STOCK | 4.51% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
|---|---|---|---|
 6762TDK Corp. NPV | 3.25% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 006400Samsung SDI Co Ltd | 6.89% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 PLSPLS Group Ltd | 4.00% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 373220LG Energy Solution Ltd | 2.69% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 MINMineral Resources Ltd | 2.32% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 IGOIGO Ltd | 1.08% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 247540Ecopro BM Co Ltd | 2.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 LACLithium Americas Corp | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
 LARLithium Argentina AG | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do LIT and SPDW overlap?
LIT and SPDW overlap by 0.5% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (LIT holds 41 positions and SPDW holds 2342), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both LIT and SPDW?
The two portfolios are 0.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of LIT and SPDW?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6752, 6762, 006400, PLS and 373220. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does LIT own that SPDW doesn't?
31 positions (72.5% of LIT) are unique to LIT, led by RIO, ALB and 002460. In the other direction, 2332 positions (98.2% of SPDW) are unique to SPDW.