LVHI vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
Franklin Templeton · 192 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-03-31
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (LVHI: 2026-03-31, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are LVHI and SCZ?
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI, by Franklin Templeton) holds 192 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 32 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 32LVHI holds 192 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- LVHI 4%·SCZ 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in LVHI
160 of 192 positions (93.0% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVHI | +4.0% | +18.9% | +33.8% | +23.2% | +16.9% | +11.5% | 4.49% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in LVHI vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(32)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by TIGO, 2768 and 2269.
0.37% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.32% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.21% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.17% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.18% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.14% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.14% | 0.10% | |
0.13% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.14% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.12% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.11% | 0.09% | |
0.17% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.25% | 0.09% | |
0.11% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.11% | 0.09% | |
0.11% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.10% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.08% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.13% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.15% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do LVHI and SCZ overlap?
LVHI and SCZ overlap by 3.0% of portfolio weight. They share 32 holdings (LVHI holds 192 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both LVHI and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 3.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of LVHI and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are TIGO, 2768, 2269, 4528 and 5406. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does LVHI own that SCZ doesn't?
160 positions (93.0% of LVHI) are unique to LVHI, led by CNQ, SHEL and SU. In the other direction, 2012 positions (95.6% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.