MCHI vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KraneShares · 31 holdings · $5.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (MCHI: 2026-05-31, KWEB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MCHI and KWEB?
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580 positions; KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB, by KraneShares) holds 31. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 31.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 31.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21MCHI holds 580 · KWEB holds 31
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MCHI 35%·KWEB 88%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MCHI
559 of 580 positions (64.1% of the fund) are not held by KWEB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MCHI | KWEB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.1% | 39.5% |
| Communication Services | 17.2% | 29.3% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 7.8% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 1.2% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 8.9% | 7.6% |
| Unclassified | 28.5% | 19.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (29% of MCHI, 19% of KWEB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
| KWEB | +12.3% | -15.8% | -15.2% | +2.0% | -6.7% | +0.1% | 7.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MCHI vs KWEB →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and PDD.
13.21% | 10.09% | 10.09% | |
10.14% | 8.93% | 8.93% | |
2.28% | 8.78% | 2.28% | |
1.84% | 7.36% | 1.84% | |
1.63% | 5.91% | 1.63% | |
1.44% | 4.28% | 1.44% | |
1.31% | 4.91% | 1.31% | |
1.11% | 3.56% | 1.11% | |
0.57% | 3.33% | 0.57% | |
0.42% | 4.34% | 0.42% | |
0.21% | 4.01% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 2.50% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 2.86% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 2.70% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 3.17% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 3.24% | 0.15% | |
0.11% | 1.82% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 2.23% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 1.90% | 0.09% | |
0.05% | 1.06% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.98% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MCHI and KWEB overlap?
MCHI and KWEB overlap by 31.1% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (MCHI holds 580 positions and KWEB holds 31), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MCHI and KWEB?
The two portfolios are 31.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MCHI and KWEB?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, PDD, 3690 and 9999. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does MCHI own that KWEB doesn't?
559 positions (64.1% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI, led by C6T, 1810 and ICK. In the other direction, 10 positions (11.9% of KWEB) are unique to KWEB.