MCHI vs VEA: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
VEAVanguard Developed Markets Index Fund
Vanguard · 3886 holdings · $235.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (MCHI: 2026-05-31, VEA: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MCHI and VEA?
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580 positions; Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund (VEA, by Vanguard) holds 3886. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8MCHI holds 580 · VEA holds 3886
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MCHI 2%·VEA 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MCHI
572 of 580 positions (97.7% of the fund) are not held by VEA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MCHI | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.1% | 5.4% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 20.4% |
| Communication Services | 17.2% | 2.7% |
| Industrials | 1.6% | 13.9% |
| Information Technology | 7.8% | 9.9% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 28.4% |
| Unclassified | 28.5% | 18.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (29% of MCHI, 19% of VEA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
| VEA | +3.0% | +17.5% | +29.9% | +19.8% | +10.2% | +10.3% | 2.49% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MCHI vs VEA →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 992, 2259 and 2313.
 992Lenovo Group Ltd | 0.94% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
|---|---|---|---|
 2259Zijin Gold International Co Ltd | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 2313Shenzhou International Group Holdings Ltd | 0.19% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 1208MMG Ltd | 0.18% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 2018AAC Technologies Holdings Inc | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 1929Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd | 0.10% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 316Orient Overseas International Ltd | 0.09% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 8BOBOC Aviation Ltd | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MCHI and VEA overlap?
MCHI and VEA overlap by 0.1% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (MCHI holds 580 positions and VEA holds 3886), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MCHI and VEA?
The two portfolios are 0.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MCHI and VEA?
The largest positions held by both funds are 992, 2259, 2313, 1208 and 2018. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does MCHI own that VEA doesn't?
572 positions (97.7% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI, led by 700, 9988 and C6T. In the other direction, 3878 positions (99.0% of VEA) are unique to VEA.