MCHI vs VT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 10033 holdings · $80.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (MCHI: 2026-05-31, VT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MCHI and VT?
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580 positions; Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VT, by Vanguard) holds 10033. They have 570 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 570MCHI holds 580 · VT holds 10033
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MCHI 99%·VT 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MCHI
10 of 580 positions (0.9% of the fund) are not held by VT.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MCHI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 7.8% | 25.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.1% | 8.3% |
| Communication Services | 17.2% | 7.8% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 14.5% |
| Industrials | 1.6% | 10.2% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 23.4% |
| Unclassified | 28.5% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (29% of MCHI, 9% of VT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
| VT | +3.2% | +15.0% | +25.3% | +20.1% | +11.1% | +12.6% | 1.54% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MCHI vs VT →
Shared Holdings(570)
The top 10 shared positions account for 42% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and C6T.
13.21% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
10.14% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
3.97% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
2.28% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
2.10% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
2.35% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.84% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.96% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.63% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.80% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.63% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.31% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.44% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.11% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.12% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.97% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.05% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.77% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.90% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.64% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.60% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.60% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.56% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Showing the top 250 of 570 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MCHI and VT overlap?
MCHI and VT overlap by 2.5% of portfolio weight. They share 570 holdings (MCHI holds 580 positions and VT holds 10033), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MCHI and VT?
The two portfolios are 2.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MCHI and VT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, C6T, PDD and ICK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 42% of the total overlap.
What does MCHI own that VT doesn't?
10 positions (0.9% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI, led by HTHT, HONG KONG DOLLAR and 000333. In the other direction, 9463 positions (96.8% of VT) are unique to VT.