MCHI vs XT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (MCHI: 2026-05-31, XT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MCHI and XT?
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580 positions; iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219. They have 30 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 30MCHI holds 580 · XT holds 219
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MCHI 32%·XT 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MCHI
550 of 580 positions (67.9% of the fund) are not held by XT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MCHI | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 7.8% | 42.5% |
| Health Care | 0.9% | 23.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.1% | 7.2% |
| Communication Services | 17.2% | 5.2% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 4.1% |
| Other Sectors | 9.2% | 15.5% |
| Unclassified | 28.5% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (29% of MCHI, 2% of XT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MCHI vs XT →
Shared Holdings(30)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by 1810, 700 and 9988.
2.35% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
13.21% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
10.14% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.40% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.63% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.39% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.36% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.28% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.18% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.74% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.60% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.22% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.44% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.08% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| CSI Solar Co Ltd | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.03% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.15% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
| Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co Ltd | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Trina Solar Co Ltd | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MCHI and XT overlap?
MCHI and XT overlap by 3.5% of portfolio weight. They share 30 holdings (MCHI holds 580 positions and XT holds 219), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MCHI and XT?
The two portfolios are 3.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MCHI and XT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1810, 700, 9988, 9866 and C7A0. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does MCHI own that XT doesn't?
550 positions (67.9% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI, led by C6T, PDD and ICK. In the other direction, 189 positions (96.2% of XT) are unique to XT.