MDYG vs IJK: Holdings Overlap
MDYGState Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Mid Cap Growth ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 245 holdings · $2.9B · as of 2026-08-06
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (MDYG: 2026-08-06, IJK: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MDYG and IJK?
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 245 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242. They have 234 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 86.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 86.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 234MDYG holds 245 · IJK holds 242
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MDYG 93%·IJK 95%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MDYG
11 of 245 positions (6.4% of the fund) are not held by IJK.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MDYG | IJK |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 29.8% | 31.3% |
| Information Technology | 20.2% | 17.3% |
| Health Care | 15.5% | 14.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.0% | 10.2% |
| Financials | 8.0% | 7.2% |
| Other Sectors | 17.3% | 19.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | +3.3% | +21.6% | +28.0% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +11.3% | 0.56% |
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MDYG vs IJK →
Shared Holdings(234)
The top 10 shared positions account for 14% of the overlap, led by FTI, CW and XPO.
1.48% | 1.71% | 1.48% | |
1.41% | 1.54% | 1.41% | |
1.23% | 1.40% | 1.23% | |
1.63% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
1.21% | 1.57% | 1.21% | |
1.48% | 1.20% | 1.20% | |
1.41% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
1.56% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
1.16% | 1.31% | 1.16% | |
1.47% | 1.14% | 1.14% | |
1.04% | 1.15% | 1.04% | |
1.18% | 1.02% | 1.02% | |
1.02% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
0.95% | 1.05% | 0.95% | |
0.95% | 1.26% | 0.95% | |
0.92% | 1.09% | 0.92% | |
1.06% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
0.85% | 1.21% | 0.85% | |
0.85% | 0.95% | 0.85% | |
0.82% | 0.89% | 0.82% | |
1.28% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
0.81% | 1.15% | 0.81% | |
0.86% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
0.88% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
0.76% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MDYG and IJK overlap?
MDYG and IJK overlap by 86.9% of portfolio weight. They share 234 holdings (MDYG holds 245 positions and IJK holds 242), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MDYG and IJK?
The two portfolios are 86.9% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MDYG and IJK?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, CW, XPO, ATI and UTHR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 14% of the total overlap.
What does MDYG own that IJK doesn't?
11 positions (6.4% of MDYG) are unique to MDYG, led by ROKU, TOST and CDE. In the other direction, 8 positions (4.7% of IJK) are unique to IJK.