MGC vs OEF: Holdings Overlap
MGCVanguard Mega Cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 173 holdings · $10.3B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 101 holdings · $20.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (MGC: 2026-05-31, OEF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MGC and OEF?
Vanguard Mega Cap Index Fund (MGC, by Vanguard) holds 173 positions; iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF, by iShares) holds 101. They have 100 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 84.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 84.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 100MGC holds 173 · OEF holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MGC 88%·OEF 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MGC
73 of 173 positions (12.2% of the fund) are not held by OEF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in OEF
1 of 101 positions (0.2% of the fund) are not held by MGC.
GMGeneral Motors Company COM0.17%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MGC | OEF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 42.4% | 38.9% |
| Communication Services | 12.2% | 13.5% |
| Financials | 10.7% | 11.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.7% | 10.2% |
| Health Care | 8.6% | 9.3% |
| Other Sectors | 16.0% | 16.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGC | +3.6% | +13.6% | +24.3% | +22.7% | +14.0% | +16.2% | 0.89% |
| OEF | +4.0% | +12.2% | +23.1% | +23.3% | +14.9% | +16.5% | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MGC vs OEF →
Shared Holdings(100)
The top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
9.10% | 10.50% | 9.10% | |
8.55% | 9.23% | 8.55% | |
6.24% | 6.81% | 6.24% | |
4.88% | 5.04% | 4.88% | |
4.13% | 4.15% | 4.13% | |
3.95% | 3.63% | 3.63% | |
3.25% | 3.32% | 3.25% | |
2.58% | 3.10% | 2.58% | |
2.29% | 2.59% | 2.29% | |
1.75% | 1.81% | 1.75% | |
1.53% | 2.18% | 1.53% | |
1.41% | 1.96% | 1.41% | |
1.13% | 1.76% | 1.13% | |
1.02% | 1.26% | 1.02% | |
1.01% | 1.46% | 1.01% | |
0.95% | 1.35% | 0.95% | |
2.04% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
1.57% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
0.79% | 1.10% | 0.79% | |
0.76% | 0.82% | 0.76% | |
0.80% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
0.73% | 1.01% | 0.73% | |
0.72% | 0.95% | 0.72% | |
0.68% | 1.01% | 0.68% | |
0.67% | 0.67% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MGC and OEF overlap?
MGC and OEF overlap by 84.6% of portfolio weight. They share 100 holdings (MGC holds 173 positions and OEF holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MGC and OEF?
The two portfolios are 84.6% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MGC and OEF?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the total overlap.
What does MGC own that OEF doesn't?
73 positions (12.2% of MGC) are unique to MGC, led by KLAC, SNDK and PANW. In the other direction, 1 positions (0.2% of OEF) are unique to OEF.