MGV vs VT: Holdings Overlap
MGVVanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund
Vanguard · 120 holdings · $13.6B · as of 2026-05-31
VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 10033 holdings · $80.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (MGV: 2026-05-31, VT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MGV and VT?
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund (MGV, by Vanguard) holds 120 positions; Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VT, by Vanguard) holds 10033. They have 120 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 120MGV holds 120 · VT holds 10033
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MGV 100%·VT 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MGV
Every position in MGV is also held by VT, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MGV | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 18.0% | 25.9% |
| Financials | 21.6% | 14.5% |
| Health Care | 15.9% | 7.4% |
| Industrials | 13.6% | 10.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 11.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 18.3% | 27.8% |
| Unclassified | 1.1% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of MGV, 9% of VT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGV | +1.6% | +19.3% | +30.6% | +18.7% | +13.1% | +13.0% | 1.83% |
| VT | +3.2% | +15.0% | +25.3% | +20.1% | +11.1% | +12.6% | 1.54% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MGV vs VT →
Shared Holdings(120)
The top 10 shared positions account for 27% of the overlap, led by JPM, BRK-B and XOM.
3.64% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
3.15% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
2.91% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
5.26% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
2.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
2.61% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
2.04% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
2.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.96% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.85% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
2.06% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.66% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.60% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.60% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.66% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.52% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.72% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.31% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.55% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.41% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.39% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.33% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.33% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.15% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.16% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MGV and VT overlap?
MGV and VT overlap by 18.7% of portfolio weight. They share 120 holdings (MGV holds 120 positions and VT holds 10033), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MGV and VT?
The two portfolios are 18.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MGV and VT?
The largest positions held by both funds are JPM, BRK-B, XOM, MU and WMT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 27% of the total overlap.
What does MGV own that VT doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in MGV is also held by VT. In the other direction, 9913 positions (80.6% of VT) are unique to VT.