NLR vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
VanEck · 25 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (NLR: 2026-03-31, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are NLR and KOMP?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR, by VanEck) holds 25 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2NLR holds 25 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- NLR 15%·KOMP 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in NLR
23 of 25 positions (85.2% of the fund) are not held by KOMP.
Only in KOMP
499 of 501 positions (99.4% of the fund) are not held by NLR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | NLR | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 43.6% | 1.2% |
| Utilities | 37.9% | 1.9% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 14.6% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 12.8% |
| Unclassified | 3.7% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of NLR, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | +6.4% | -5.1% | +1.2% | +27.4% | +20.4% | +12.2% | 2.69% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in NLR vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(2)
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do NLR and KOMP overlap?
NLR and KOMP overlap by 0.5% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (NLR holds 25 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both NLR and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 0.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of NLR and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are CEG and BWXT. Together the top 2 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does NLR own that KOMP doesn't?
23 positions (85.2% of NLR) are unique to NLR, led by CCJ, PEG and PCG. In the other direction, 499 positions (99.4% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.