NLR vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
VanEck · 25 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (NLR: 2026-03-31, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are NLR and SCZ?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR, by VanEck) holds 25 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 4 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 4NLR holds 25 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- NLR 10%·SCZ 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in NLR
21 of 25 positions (89.9% of the fund) are not held by SCZ.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | +6.4% | -5.1% | +1.2% | +27.4% | +20.4% | +12.2% | 2.69% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in NLR vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(4)
The top 4 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by PDN, 0LZ and DYL.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do NLR and SCZ overlap?
NLR and SCZ overlap by 0.2% of portfolio weight. They share 4 holdings (NLR holds 25 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both NLR and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 0.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of NLR and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are PDN, 0LZ, DYL and Silex Systems Ltd. Together the top 4 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does NLR own that SCZ doesn't?
21 positions (89.9% of NLR) are unique to NLR, led by CCJ, CEG and BWXT. In the other direction, 2040 positions (99.1% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.