OMFL vs JQUA: Holdings Overlap
OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Invesco · 478 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-05-31
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (OMFL: 2026-05-31, JQUA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are OMFL and JQUA?
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL, by Invesco) holds 478 positions; JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289. They have 215 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 47.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 47.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 215OMFL holds 478 · JQUA holds 289
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- OMFL 79%·JQUA 85%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in OMFL
263 of 478 positions (21.2% of the fund) are not held by JQUA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | OMFL | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 33.6% | 37.8% |
| Financials | 11.1% | 12.4% |
| Communication Services | 11.2% | 6.8% |
| Industrials | 9.7% | 10.0% |
| Health Care | 9.8% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 24.6% | 24.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMFL | +3.5% | +17.0% | +23.0% | +13.4% | +9.8% | — | 0.78% |
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in OMFL vs JQUA →
Shared Holdings(215)
The top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, NVDA and AAPL.
4.38% | 2.35% | 2.35% | |
5.05% | 2.05% | 2.05% | |
8.57% | 2.01% | 2.01% | |
1.84% | 1.71% | 1.71% | |
2.59% | 1.70% | 1.70% | |
3.14% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
2.37% | 1.61% | 1.61% | |
1.54% | 1.77% | 1.54% | |
1.34% | 1.44% | 1.34% | |
1.76% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
2.17% | 1.15% | 1.15% | |
1.19% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.03% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
0.97% | 0.89% | 0.89% | |
0.86% | 2.11% | 0.86% | |
0.83% | 1.21% | 0.83% | |
2.75% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
1.91% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
0.77% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
0.73% | 1.70% | 0.73% | |
1.11% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
0.55% | 1.08% | 0.55% | |
1.72% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.51% | 1.15% | 0.51% | |
1.14% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do OMFL and JQUA overlap?
OMFL and JQUA overlap by 47.9% of portfolio weight. They share 215 holdings (OMFL holds 478 positions and JQUA holds 289), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both OMFL and JQUA?
The two portfolios are 47.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of OMFL and JQUA?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, NVDA, AAPL, META and V. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the total overlap.
What does OMFL own that JQUA doesn't?
263 positions (21.2% of OMFL) are unique to OMFL, led by GOOG, MCK and AMZN. In the other direction, 74 positions (14.4% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA.