OMFL vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Invesco · 478 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-05-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are OMFL and ONEQ?
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL, by Invesco) holds 478 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 168 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 44.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 44.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 168OMFL holds 478 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- OMFL 59%·ONEQ 82%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in OMFL
310 of 478 positions (41.2% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ONEQ
854 of 1022 positions (17.7% of the fund) are not held by OMFL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | OMFL | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 33.6% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 11.2% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.4% | 12.5% |
| Financials | 11.1% | 2.8% |
| Health Care | 9.8% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 24.8% | 10.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of OMFL, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMFL | +3.5% | +17.0% | +23.0% | +13.4% | +9.8% | — | 0.78% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in OMFL vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(168)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by AAPL, NVDA and GOOGL.
8.57% | 9.98% | 8.57% | |
5.05% | 11.18% | 5.05% | |
4.38% | 4.83% | 4.38% | |
3.53% | 4.46% | 3.53% | |
3.14% | 7.29% | 3.14% | |
2.37% | 2.37% | 2.37% | |
1.84% | 3.01% | 1.84% | |
1.65% | 6.33% | 1.65% | |
1.10% | 2.01% | 1.10% | |
1.34% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
2.17% | 0.86% | 0.86% | |
0.86% | 4.61% | 0.86% | |
0.83% | 1.03% | 0.83% | |
1.19% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
2.75% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.97% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.77% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.14% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.27% | 0.36% | 0.27% | |
0.24% | 0.50% | 0.24% | |
0.94% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.27% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.83% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.28% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.69% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do OMFL and ONEQ overlap?
OMFL and ONEQ overlap by 44.1% of portfolio weight. They share 168 holdings (OMFL holds 478 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both OMFL and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 44.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of OMFL and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AAPL, NVDA, GOOGL, GOOG and MSFT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does OMFL own that ONEQ doesn't?
310 positions (41.2% of OMFL) are unique to OMFL, led by V, CVX and MCK. In the other direction, 854 positions (17.7% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.