OMFL vs PRF: Holdings Overlap
OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Invesco · 478 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Invesco · 1003 holdings · $10.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (OMFL: 2026-05-31, PRF: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are OMFL and PRF?
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL, by Invesco) holds 478 positions; Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF, by Invesco) holds 1003. They have 430 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 40.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 40.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 430OMFL holds 478 · PRF holds 1003
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- OMFL 95%·PRF 68%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in OMFL
48 of 478 positions (5.0% of the fund) are not held by PRF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | OMFL | PRF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 33.6% | 20.1% |
| Financials | 11.1% | 16.1% |
| Health Care | 9.8% | 11.7% |
| Communication Services | 11.2% | 10.2% |
| Industrials | 9.7% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 24.6% | 32.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMFL | +3.5% | +17.0% | +23.0% | +13.4% | +9.8% | — | 0.78% |
| PRF | +2.9% | +20.0% | +33.4% | +20.5% | +13.5% | +13.8% | 1.33% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in OMFL vs PRF →
Shared Holdings(430)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AAPL and MSFT.
4.38% | 4.79% | 4.38% | |
8.57% | 4.08% | 4.08% | |
3.14% | 2.17% | 2.17% | |
1.65% | 2.32% | 1.65% | |
1.54% | 1.69% | 1.54% | |
1.84% | 1.42% | 1.42% | |
1.91% | 1.33% | 1.33% | |
1.10% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
2.37% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
0.83% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
0.73% | 1.09% | 0.73% | |
1.03% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.86% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
5.05% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
0.51% | 0.66% | 0.51% | |
1.34% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
2.75% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.19% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.84% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
2.17% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
2.59% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.70% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.70% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.77% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.35% | 0.27% |
Showing the top 250 of 430 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do OMFL and PRF overlap?
OMFL and PRF overlap by 40.8% of portfolio weight. They share 430 holdings (OMFL holds 478 positions and PRF holds 1003), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both OMFL and PRF?
The two portfolios are 40.8% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of OMFL and PRF?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and BRK-B. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does OMFL own that PRF doesn't?
48 positions (5.0% of OMFL) are unique to OMFL, led by GOOG, GRMN and LULU. In the other direction, 573 positions (31.8% of PRF) are unique to PRF.