ONEQ vs RWR: Holdings Overlap
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
RWRState Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 97 holdings · $1.9B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (ONEQ: 2026-05-31, RWR: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ONEQ and RWR?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022 positions; State Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF (RWR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 97. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7ONEQ holds 1022 · RWR holds 97
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ONEQ 0%·RWR 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ONEQ
1015 of 1022 positions (99.2% of the fund) are not held by RWR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ONEQ | RWR |
|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | 0.5% | 99.0% |
| Information Technology | 53.0% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 15.2% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 1.6% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of ONEQ, 0% of RWR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
| RWR | -0.8% | +18.6% | +23.5% | +11.8% | +4.3% | +4.9% | 3.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ONEQ vs RWR →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by EQIX, HST and REG.
 EQIXEquinix, Inc. COM | 0.23% | 4.44% | 0.23% |
|---|---|---|---|
 HSTHost Hotels & Resorts Inc COM | 0.03% | 1.38% | 0.03% |
 REGRegency Centers Corp. COM | 0.03% | 1.18% | 0.03% |
 PECOPhillips Edison & Co Inc COMMON STOCK | 0.01% | 0.48% | 0.01% |
 FRMIFermi Inc. COM | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
 DRHDiamondRock Hospitality Co. COM | 0.01% | 0.24% | 0.01% |
 DHCDiversified Healthcare Trust COM SH BEN INT | 0.01% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ONEQ and RWR overlap?
ONEQ and RWR overlap by 0.3% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (ONEQ holds 1022 positions and RWR holds 97), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ONEQ and RWR?
The two portfolios are 0.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ONEQ and RWR?
The largest positions held by both funds are EQIX, HST, REG, PECO and FRMI. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ONEQ own that RWR doesn't?
1015 positions (99.2% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 90 positions (91.3% of RWR) are unique to RWR.