ONEQ vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ONEQ: 2026-05-31, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ONEQ and SCZ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15ONEQ holds 1022 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ONEQ 0%·SCZ 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ONEQ
1007 of 1022 positions (99.3% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ONEQ vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by ENLT, TIGO and CAMT.
 ENLTEnlight Renewable Energy Ltd. | 0.04% | 0.32% | 0.04% |
|---|---|---|---|
 TIGOMillicom International Cellular SA COM USD1.50 | 0.03% | 0.23% | 0.03% |
 CAMTCamtek Ltd/Israel | 0.01% | 0.16% | 0.01% |
 GLBEGlobal-e Online Ltd | 0.01% | 0.09% | 0.01% |
 CLBTCELLEBRITE DI LTD | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.01% |
| Nayax Ltd | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.01% |
 ETOREtoro Group Ltd | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 TRMDTORM PLC | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.01% |
 PHVSPharvaris NV | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
 WIXWix.com Ltd | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.01% |
 BTDRBitdeer Technologies Group CL A ORD SHS | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.01% |
 RDWRRadware Ltd. ORD | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.01% |
| Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Matrix IT Ltd | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
 MLCOMELCO RESORTS and ENTERTAINMENTS LTD ADR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ONEQ and SCZ overlap?
ONEQ and SCZ overlap by 0.2% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (ONEQ holds 1022 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ONEQ and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 0.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ONEQ and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENLT, TIGO, CAMT, GLBE and CLBT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does ONEQ own that SCZ doesn't?
1007 positions (99.3% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 2029 positions (98.1% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.