ONEQ vs SPMO: Holdings Overlap
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Invesco · 99 holdings · $21.3B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ONEQ and SPMO?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO, by Invesco) holds 99. They have 33 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 34.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 34.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 33ONEQ holds 1022 · SPMO holds 99
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ONEQ 38%·SPMO 63%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ONEQ
989 of 1022 positions (61.3% of the fund) are not held by SPMO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ONEQ | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 53.0% | 54.9% |
| Communication Services | 15.2% | 8.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% | 1.2% |
| Industrials | 3.1% | 12.4% |
| Health Care | 4.4% | 6.2% |
| Other Sectors | 9.7% | 16.6% |
| Unclassified | 1.6% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of ONEQ, 0% of SPMO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
| SPMO | +0.2% | +26.0% | +29.7% | +39.1% | +20.9% | +20.0% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ONEQ vs SPMO →
Shared Holdings(33)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by NVDA, GOOGL and AVGO.
11.18% | 8.46% | 8.46% | |
4.83% | 4.81% | 4.81% | |
4.61% | 7.58% | 4.61% | |
4.46% | 3.82% | 3.82% | |
2.37% | 10.73% | 2.37% | |
1.83% | 4.14% | 1.83% | |
1.24% | 2.95% | 1.24% | |
1.03% | 2.02% | 1.03% | |
0.86% | 3.54% | 0.86% | |
0.78% | 1.39% | 0.78% | |
0.77% | 1.77% | 0.77% | |
0.55% | 1.39% | 0.55% | |
0.54% | 2.46% | 0.54% | |
0.44% | 0.82% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 1.88% | 0.42% | |
0.39% | 1.77% | 0.39% | |
0.36% | 0.83% | 0.36% | |
0.21% | 0.41% | 0.21% | |
0.18% | 0.45% | 0.18% | |
0.16% | 0.32% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.30% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.30% | 0.15% | |
0.13% | 0.30% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.18% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.19% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ONEQ and SPMO overlap?
ONEQ and SPMO overlap by 34.8% of portfolio weight. They share 33 holdings (ONEQ holds 1022 positions and SPMO holds 99), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ONEQ and SPMO?
The two portfolios are 34.8% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ONEQ and SPMO?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG and MU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does ONEQ own that SPMO doesn't?
989 positions (61.3% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ, led by AAPL, MSFT and AMZN. In the other direction, 66 positions (36.6% of SPMO) are unique to SPMO.