ONEQ vs VT: Holdings Overlap
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 10033 holdings · $80.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ONEQ: 2026-05-31, VT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ONEQ and VT?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022 positions; Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VT, by Vanguard) holds 10033. They have 622 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 33.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 33.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 622ONEQ holds 1022 · VT holds 10033
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ONEQ 96%·VT 34%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ONEQ
400 of 1022 positions (3.4% of the fund) are not held by VT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VT
9411 of 10033 positions (65.4% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ONEQ | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 53.0% | 25.9% |
| Communication Services | 15.2% | 7.8% |
| Financials | 2.8% | 14.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% | 8.3% |
| Industrials | 3.1% | 10.2% |
| Other Sectors | 11.3% | 23.4% |
| Unclassified | 1.6% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of ONEQ, 9% of VT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
| VT | +3.2% | +15.0% | +25.3% | +20.1% | +11.1% | +12.6% | 1.54% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ONEQ vs VT →
Shared Holdings(622)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 11.18% | 4.19% | 4.19% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AAPLApple Inc. COM | 9.98% | 3.50% | 3.50% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 7.29% | 2.71% | 2.71% |
 AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. COM | 6.33% | 2.28% | 2.28% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 4.83% | 2.03% | 2.03% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 4.61% | 1.73% | 1.73% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 4.46% | 1.60% | 1.60% |
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 3.01% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
 TSLATesla Inc COM | 3.56% | 0.97% | 0.97% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 2.37% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
 WMTWalmart Inc COM | 2.01% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 1.83% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
 COSTCostco Wholesale Corporation COM | 0.92% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 INTCIntel Corporation COM | 1.24% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
 NFLXNetflix, Inc. COM | 0.79% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 1.03% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 LRCXLam Research Corporation COM NEW | 0.86% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 0.77% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc., Class A | 0.78% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
 TXNTexas Instruments Inc. COM | 0.60% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 LINLinde PLC COM EUR0.001 | 0.50% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.55% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 PEPPepsico Inc COM | 0.43% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 ADIAnalog Devices Inc. COM | 0.44% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM Inc. COM | 0.58% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Showing the top 250 of 622 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ONEQ and VT overlap?
ONEQ and VT overlap by 33.9% of portfolio weight. They share 622 holdings (ONEQ holds 1022 positions and VT holds 10033), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ONEQ and VT?
The two portfolios are 33.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ONEQ and VT?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does ONEQ own that VT doesn't?
400 positions (3.4% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ, led by ASML, ARM and TRI. In the other direction, 9411 positions (65.4% of VT) are unique to VT.