PAVE vs REGL: Holdings Overlap
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Global X · 100 holdings · $14.1B · as of 2026-05-31
REGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 65 holdings · $1.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are PAVE and REGL?
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE, by Global X) holds 100 positions; ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL, by ProShares) holds 65. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6PAVE holds 100 · REGL holds 65
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- PAVE 5%·REGL 9%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in PAVE
94 of 100 positions (95.3% of the fund) are not held by REGL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | PAVE | REGL |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 75.1% | 13.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 30.9% |
| Materials | 20.3% | 13.4% |
| Utilities | 3.1% | 15.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 1.1% | 17.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAVE | +4.0% | +23.0% | +29.9% | +22.7% | +18.1% | — | 0.73% |
| REGL | +3.7% | +14.8% | +18.4% | +12.5% | +8.5% | +9.8% | 2.13% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in PAVE vs REGL →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by RS, CSL and LECO.
 RSReliance Inc COM | 1.08% | 1.78% | 1.08% |
|---|---|---|---|
 CSLCarlisle Companies Incorporated | 0.78% | 1.51% | 0.78% |
 LECOLincoln Electric Holdings Inc. COM | 0.77% | 1.56% | 0.77% |
 RPMRPM International Inc. COM | 0.74% | 1.55% | 0.74% |
 GGGGraco Inc COM | 0.68% | 1.36% | 0.68% |
 WLKWestlake Corporation COMMON STOCK | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do PAVE and REGL overlap?
PAVE and REGL overlap by 4.6% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (PAVE holds 100 positions and REGL holds 65), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both PAVE and REGL?
The two portfolios are 4.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of PAVE and REGL?
The largest positions held by both funds are RS, CSL, LECO, RPM and GGG. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does PAVE own that REGL doesn't?
94 positions (95.3% of PAVE) are unique to PAVE, led by PWR, CSX and ETN. In the other direction, 59 positions (90.8% of REGL) are unique to REGL.