PRF vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
Invesco · 1003 holdings · $10.0B · as of 2026-04-30
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (PRF: 2026-04-30, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are PRF and ONEQ?
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF, by Invesco) holds 1003 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 294 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 34.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 34.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 294PRF holds 1003 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- PRF 39%·ONEQ 85%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in PRF
709 of 1003 positions (61.3% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ONEQ
728 of 1022 positions (14.5% of the fund) are not held by PRF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | PRF | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 20.1% | 53.0% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 2.8% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 12.5% |
| Health Care | 11.7% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 33.2% | 10.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of PRF, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRF | +2.9% | +20.0% | +33.4% | +20.5% | +13.5% | +13.8% | 1.33% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in PRF vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(294)
The top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AAPL and AMZN.
4.79% | 4.83% | 4.79% | |
4.08% | 9.98% | 4.08% | |
2.32% | 6.33% | 2.32% | |
2.17% | 7.29% | 2.17% | |
1.42% | 3.01% | 1.42% | |
2.62% | 1.24% | 1.24% | |
0.94% | 2.01% | 0.94% | |
0.90% | 2.37% | 0.90% | |
0.76% | 1.03% | 0.76% | |
0.66% | 4.61% | 0.66% | |
0.56% | 11.18% | 0.56% | |
0.45% | 1.83% | 0.45% | |
0.45% | 0.92% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 0.58% | 0.44% | |
0.43% | 0.77% | 0.43% | |
0.40% | 0.60% | 0.40% | |
0.40% | 0.43% | 0.40% | |
0.38% | 0.39% | 0.38% | |
0.35% | 0.86% | 0.35% | |
0.35% | 0.36% | 0.35% | |
0.30% | 0.44% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 3.56% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.50% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.39% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.33% | 0.27% |
Showing the top 250 of 294 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do PRF and ONEQ overlap?
PRF and ONEQ overlap by 34.7% of portfolio weight. They share 294 holdings (PRF holds 1003 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both PRF and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 34.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of PRF and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AAPL, AMZN, MSFT and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the total overlap.
What does PRF own that ONEQ doesn't?
709 positions (61.3% of PRF) are unique to PRF, led by XOM, BRK-B and JPM. In the other direction, 728 positions (14.5% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.