QQQI vs GPIX: Holdings Overlap
QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
NEOS · 101 holdings · $13.9B · as of 2026-03-31
GPIXGoldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Goldman Sachs · 494 holdings · $5.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are QQQI and GPIX?
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF (QQQI, by NEOS) holds 101 positions; Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX, by Goldman Sachs) holds 494. They have 86 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 47.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 47.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 86QQQI holds 101 · GPIX holds 494
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QQQI 94%·GPIX 48%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in QQQI
15 of 101 positions (4.6% of the fund) are not held by GPIX.
Only in GPIX
408 of 494 positions (51.6% of the fund) are not held by QQQI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QQQI | GPIX |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.3% | 32.5% |
| Communication Services | 15.9% | 7.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% | 9.6% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 12.2% |
| Health Care | 5.0% | 9.3% |
| Other Sectors | 16.1% | 25.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 3.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of QQQI, 4% of GPIX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | +1.3% | +11.3% | +20.0% | — | — | — | 13.81% |
| GPIX | +2.8% | +13.0% | +22.3% | — | — | — | 8.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QQQI vs GPIX →
Shared Holdings(86)
The top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
8.64% | 7.59% | 7.59% | |
7.67% | 6.68% | 6.68% | |
5.62% | 4.82% | 4.82% | |
4.54% | 3.67% | 3.67% | |
3.41% | 2.80% | 2.80% | |
2.98% | 2.58% | 2.58% | |
3.80% | 1.82% | 1.82% | |
3.17% | 1.61% | 1.61% | |
3.42% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
3.42% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
2.49% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
2.14% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
1.87% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.89% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.72% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.53% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.51% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
2.29% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.30% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.18% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.08% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.06% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.99% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.97% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QQQI and GPIX overlap?
QQQI and GPIX overlap by 47.9% of portfolio weight. They share 86 holdings (QQQI holds 101 positions and GPIX holds 494), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QQQI and GPIX?
The two portfolios are 47.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QQQI and GPIX?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the total overlap.
What does QQQI own that GPIX doesn't?
15 positions (4.6% of QQQI) are unique to QQQI, led by SHOP, ASML and MELI. In the other direction, 408 positions (51.6% of GPIX) are unique to GPIX.