QQQI vs RDVY: Holdings Overlap
QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
NEOS · 101 holdings · $13.9B · as of 2026-03-31
RDVYFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
First Trust · 73 holdings · $25.6B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are QQQI and RDVY?
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF (QQQI, by NEOS) holds 101 positions; First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY, by First Trust) holds 73. They have 22 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 19.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 19.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 22QQQI holds 101 · RDVY holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QQQI 42%·RDVY 36%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in QQQI
79 of 101 positions (56.9% of the fund) are not held by RDVY. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in RDVY
51 of 73 positions (64.3% of the fund) are not held by QQQI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QQQI | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.3% | 21.5% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 35.3% |
| Industrials | 4.1% | 16.2% |
| Communication Services | 15.9% | 5.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% | 10.9% |
| Other Sectors | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | +1.3% | +11.3% | +20.0% | — | — | — | 13.81% |
| RDVY | +4.5% | +20.5% | +32.6% | +20.8% | +13.2% | +16.3% | 0.81% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QQQI vs RDVY →
Shared Holdings(22)
The top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, NVDA and META.
3.41% | 2.32% | 2.32% | |
8.64% | 2.06% | 2.06% | |
3.42% | 1.67% | 1.67% | |
5.62% | 1.58% | 1.58% | |
2.49% | 1.57% | 1.57% | |
1.53% | 3.14% | 1.53% | |
1.51% | 3.35% | 1.51% | |
1.08% | 2.80% | 1.08% | |
7.67% | 1.03% | 1.03% | |
0.75% | 1.65% | 0.75% | |
0.46% | 1.50% | 0.46% | |
0.44% | 0.52% | 0.44% | |
2.14% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.40% | 2.56% | 0.40% | |
0.77% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.34% | 1.65% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 2.47% | 0.33% | |
0.29% | 1.95% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.62% | 0.28% | |
0.23% | 0.52% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.54% | 0.22% | |
0.16% | 1.24% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QQQI and RDVY overlap?
QQQI and RDVY overlap by 19.1% of portfolio weight. They share 22 holdings (QQQI holds 101 positions and RDVY holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QQQI and RDVY?
The two portfolios are 19.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QQQI and RDVY?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, NVDA, META, MSFT and COST. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 79% of the total overlap.
What does QQQI own that RDVY doesn't?
79 positions (56.9% of QQQI) are unique to QQQI, led by AMZN, TSLA and WMT. In the other direction, 51 positions (64.3% of RDVY) are unique to RDVY.