QQQM vs IVW: Holdings Overlap
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 143 holdings · $77.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (QQQM: 2026-05-31, IVW: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are QQQM and IVW?
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101 positions; iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW, by iShares) holds 143. They have 47 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 53.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 53.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 47QQQM holds 101 · IVW holds 143
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QQQM 73%·IVW 71%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in QQQM
54 of 101 positions (26.3% of the fund) are not held by IVW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QQQM | IVW |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 57.8% | 47.7% |
| Communication Services | 14.2% | 16.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.4% | 9.4% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 9.8% |
| Industrials | 3.2% | 6.8% |
| Other Sectors | 12.8% | 9.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
| IVW | +4.4% | +15.5% | +25.3% | +26.7% | +14.0% | +17.7% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QQQM vs IVW →
Shared Holdings(47)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
8.13% | 14.62% | 8.13% | |
7.26% | 6.43% | 6.43% | |
5.30% | 9.48% | 5.30% | |
4.60% | 3.72% | 3.72% | |
3.51% | 5.78% | 3.51% | |
3.36% | 5.06% | 3.36% | |
3.24% | 4.63% | 3.24% | |
2.96% | 4.32% | 2.96% | |
3.45% | 2.24% | 2.24% | |
1.59% | 1.40% | 1.40% | |
4.78% | 1.31% | 1.31% | |
1.57% | 1.15% | 1.15% | |
3.68% | 1.14% | 1.14% | |
1.56% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
1.74% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.10% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
0.66% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
2.08% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
0.58% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.79% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.82% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.81% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.09% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.73% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QQQM and IVW overlap?
QQQM and IVW overlap by 53.1% of portfolio weight. They share 47 holdings (QQQM holds 101 positions and IVW holds 143), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QQQM and IVW?
The two portfolios are 53.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QQQM and IVW?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does QQQM own that IVW doesn't?
54 positions (26.3% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM, led by INTC, WMT and COST. In the other direction, 96 positions (29.4% of IVW) are unique to IVW.