QUAL vs VOT: Holdings Overlap
QUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
iShares · 121 holdings · $47.8B · as of 2026-04-30
VOTVanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 130 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (QUAL: 2026-04-30, VOT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are QUAL and VOT?
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL, by iShares) holds 121 positions; Vanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund (VOT, by Vanguard) holds 130. They have 27 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 27QUAL holds 121 · VOT holds 130
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QUAL 10%·VOT 22%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in QUAL
94 of 121 positions (89.7% of the fund) are not held by VOT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VOT
103 of 130 positions (77.8% of the fund) are not held by QUAL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QUAL | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 34.4% | 22.5% |
| Industrials | 9.4% | 25.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 15.2% |
| Financials | 11.6% | 8.5% |
| Communication Services | 11.0% | 4.0% |
| Other Sectors | 23.6% | 24.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL | +3.6% | +14.1% | +23.7% | +19.0% | +11.5% | +14.4% | 0.84% |
| VOT | +1.9% | +10.1% | +7.1% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +11.9% | 0.59% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QUAL vs VOT →
Shared Holdings(27)
The top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the overlap, led by CMG, GRMN and MPWR.
1.02% | 1.08% | 1.02% | |
0.87% | 0.99% | 0.87% | |
0.70% | 1.32% | 0.70% | |
0.76% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.54% | 0.63% | 0.54% | |
0.53% | 0.75% | 0.53% | |
0.50% | 0.60% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 1.28% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 1.87% | 0.48% | |
0.44% | 1.39% | 0.44% | |
0.38% | 0.42% | 0.38% | |
0.36% | 0.66% | 0.36% | |
0.71% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.29% | 0.95% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 1.16% | 0.28% | |
0.42% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 1.17% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.77% | 0.22% | |
0.19% | 0.66% | 0.19% | |
0.16% | 1.21% | 0.16% | |
0.13% | 0.43% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.85% | 0.12% | |
0.08% | 0.68% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.44% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.47% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QUAL and VOT overlap?
QUAL and VOT overlap by 9.5% of portfolio weight. They share 27 holdings (QUAL holds 121 positions and VOT holds 130), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QUAL and VOT?
The two portfolios are 9.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QUAL and VOT?
The largest positions held by both funds are CMG, GRMN, MPWR, FTNT and FIX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the total overlap.
What does QUAL own that VOT doesn't?
94 positions (89.7% of QUAL) are unique to QUAL, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 103 positions (77.8% of VOT) are unique to VOT.