QYLD vs QQQI: Holdings Overlap
QYLDGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Global X · 101 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
NEOS · 101 holdings · $13.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (QYLD: 2026-04-30, QQQI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are QYLD and QQQI?
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD, by Global X) holds 101 positions; NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF (QQQI, by NEOS) holds 101. They have 100 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 94.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 94.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 100QYLD holds 101 · QQQI holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QYLD 103%·QQQI 99%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QYLD | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 54.9% | 49.3% |
| Communication Services | 16.3% | 15.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.6% | 12.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 7.9% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | 4.3% | 5.0% |
| Other Sectors | 7.3% | 7.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | +1.4% | +10.1% | +21.5% | +13.4% | +8.2% | +9.7% | 11.64% |
| QQQI | +1.3% | +11.3% | +20.0% | — | — | — | 13.81% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QYLD vs QQQI →
Shared Holdings(100)
The top 10 shared positions account for 48% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
8.85% | 8.64% | 8.64% | |
7.27% | 7.67% | 7.27% | |
5.53% | 5.62% | 5.53% | |
5.19% | 4.54% | 4.54% | |
3.48% | 3.80% | 3.48% | |
4.09% | 3.41% | 3.41% | |
3.29% | 3.42% | 3.29% | |
3.25% | 3.42% | 3.25% | |
3.79% | 3.17% | 3.17% | |
3.61% | 2.98% | 2.98% | |
2.27% | 2.49% | 2.27% | |
2.93% | 2.14% | 2.14% | |
1.99% | 2.29% | 1.99% | |
2.91% | 1.87% | 1.87% | |
1.82% | 1.72% | 1.72% | |
1.60% | 1.89% | 1.60% | |
1.58% | 1.53% | 1.53% | |
1.62% | 1.51% | 1.51% | |
2.38% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.17% | 1.30% | 1.17% | |
1.09% | 1.20% | 1.09% | |
1.08% | 1.31% | 1.08% | |
1.16% | 1.08% | 1.08% | |
1.28% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
0.94% | 1.06% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QYLD and QQQI overlap?
QYLD and QQQI overlap by 94.5% of portfolio weight. They share 100 holdings (QYLD holds 101 positions and QQQI holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QYLD and QQQI?
The two portfolios are 94.5% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QYLD and QQQI?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and TSLA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 48% of the total overlap.
What does QYLD own that QQQI doesn't?
1 positions (0.8% of QYLD) are unique to QYLD, led by SNDK. In the other direction, 1 positions (0.1% of QQQI) are unique to QQQI.