RSPH vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Invesco · 59 holdings · $776M · as of 2026-04-30
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (RSPH: 2026-04-30, SMH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are RSPH and SMH?
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH, by Invesco) holds 59 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0RSPH holds 59 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- RSPH 0%·SMH 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in RSPH
59 of 59 positions (100.5% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | RSPH | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 100.5% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPH | +3.0% | +12.0% | +28.4% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +8.9% | 0.65% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in RSPH vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do RSPH and SMH overlap?
RSPH and SMH overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (RSPH holds 59 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both RSPH and SMH?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does RSPH own that SMH doesn't?
59 positions (100.5% of RSPH) are unique to RSPH, led by CNC, HUM and UNH. In the other direction, 25 positions (99.9% of SMH) are unique to SMH.