RSPH vs TCAF: Holdings Overlap
RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Invesco · 59 holdings · $776M · as of 2026-04-30
TCAFT. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
T. Rowe Price · 92 holdings · $8.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (RSPH: 2026-04-30, TCAF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are RSPH and TCAF?
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH, by Invesco) holds 59 positions; T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF, by T. Rowe Price) holds 92. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12RSPH holds 59 · TCAF holds 92
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- RSPH 21%·TCAF 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in RSPH
47 of 59 positions (79.3% of the fund) are not held by TCAF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | RSPH | TCAF |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 100.5% | 17.6% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 30.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.1% |
| Utilities | 0.0% | 10.2% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 8.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 17.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 3.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of RSPH, 3% of TCAF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPH | +3.0% | +12.0% | +28.4% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +8.9% | 0.65% |
| TCAF | +3.1% | +12.1% | +18.5% | +18.6% | — | — | 0.45% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in RSPH vs TCAF →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by UNH, WAT and BDX.
2.31% | 2.03% | 2.03% | |
1.85% | 1.64% | 1.64% | |
1.62% | 2.02% | 1.62% | |
1.56% | 2.13% | 1.56% | |
1.66% | 1.44% | 1.44% | |
1.72% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.72% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.63% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.46% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
2.22% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.59% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.77% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do RSPH and TCAF overlap?
RSPH and TCAF overlap by 12.8% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (RSPH holds 59 positions and TCAF holds 92), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both RSPH and TCAF?
The two portfolios are 12.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of RSPH and TCAF?
The largest positions held by both funds are UNH, WAT, BDX, COR and LLY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does RSPH own that TCAF doesn't?
47 positions (79.3% of RSPH) are unique to RSPH, led by CNC, HUM and ELV. In the other direction, 80 positions (86.1% of TCAF) are unique to TCAF.