RSPH vs VBR: Holdings Overlap
RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Invesco · 59 holdings · $776M · as of 2026-04-30
VBRVanguard Small-cap Value Index Fund
Vanguard · 838 holdings · $38.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (RSPH: 2026-04-30, VBR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are RSPH and VBR?
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH, by Invesco) holds 59 positions; Vanguard Small-cap Value Index Fund (VBR, by Vanguard) holds 838. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12RSPH holds 59 · VBR holds 838
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- RSPH 21%·VBR 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in RSPH
47 of 59 positions (79.0% of the fund) are not held by VBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | RSPH | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 100.5% | 8.4% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 18.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 18.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 10.9% |
| Real Estate | 0.0% | 9.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 33.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of RSPH, 1% of VBR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPH | +3.0% | +12.0% | +28.4% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +8.9% | 0.65% |
| VBR | +3.1% | +19.2% | +28.7% | +15.4% | +10.0% | +10.8% | 1.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in RSPH vs VBR →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by MRNA, VTRS and COO.
1.46% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.90% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.52% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.79% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.72% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.77% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.61% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.73% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.76% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
2.66% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
1.73% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.78% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do RSPH and VBR overlap?
RSPH and VBR overlap by 3.0% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (RSPH holds 59 positions and VBR holds 838), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both RSPH and VBR?
The two portfolios are 3.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of RSPH and VBR?
The largest positions held by both funds are MRNA, VTRS, COO, ALGN and RVTY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does RSPH own that VBR doesn't?
47 positions (79.0% of RSPH) are unique to RSPH, led by HUM, UNH and ELV. In the other direction, 826 positions (96.8% of VBR) are unique to VBR.