SCHA vs IWO: Holdings Overlap
Schwab · 1705 holdings · $23.3B · as of 2026-05-31
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (SCHA: 2026-05-31, IWO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHA and IWO?
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA, by Schwab) holds 1705 positions; iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101. They have 798 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 37.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 37.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 798SCHA holds 1705 · IWO holds 1101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHA 42%·IWO 87%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHA
907 of 1705 positions (57.5% of the fund) are not held by IWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHA | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.7% | 23.7% |
| Health Care | 13.4% | 23.1% |
| Information Technology | 22.1% | 19.0% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 8.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.3% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 21.4% | 14.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 4.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of SCHA, 4% of IWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | +1.0% | +22.8% | +36.7% | +17.1% | +7.9% | +10.8% | 1.02% |
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHA vs IWO →
Shared Holdings(798)
The top 10 shared positions account for 10% of the overlap, led by STRL, NXT and CDE.
0.56% | 0.81% | 0.56% | |
0.49% | 0.94% | 0.49% | |
0.42% | 0.64% | 0.42% | |
0.35% | 0.77% | 0.35% | |
0.33% | 0.52% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 0.62% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.66% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 0.76% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.51% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.48% | 0.30% | |
0.26% | 0.44% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.29% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.82% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.79% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.51% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 0.35% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 0.57% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 0.65% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.39% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.55% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.30% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.47% | 0.21% | |
0.30% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.76% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.38% | 0.20% |
Showing the top 250 of 798 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHA and IWO overlap?
SCHA and IWO overlap by 37.6% of portfolio weight. They share 798 holdings (SCHA holds 1705 positions and IWO holds 1101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHA and IWO?
The two portfolios are 37.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHA and IWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are STRL, NXT, CDE, GH and SITM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 10% of the total overlap.
What does SCHA own that IWO doesn't?
907 positions (57.5% of SCHA) are unique to SCHA, led by SNDK, LITE and RVMD. In the other direction, 303 positions (12.5% of IWO) are unique to IWO.