SCHK vs BKLC: Holdings Overlap
Schwab · 986 holdings · $5.7B · as of 2026-05-31
BKLCBNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
BNY Mellon · 505 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (SCHK: 2026-05-31, BKLC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHK and BKLC?
Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK, by Schwab) holds 986 positions; BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC, by BNY Mellon) holds 505. They have 493 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 90.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 90.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 493SCHK holds 986 · BKLC holds 505
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHK 93%·BKLC 99%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHK
493 of 986 positions (6.6% of the fund) are not held by BKLC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in BKLC
12 of 505 positions (0.4% of the fund) are not held by SCHK.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHK | BKLC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.2% | 34.6% |
| Financials | 11.5% | 11.7% |
| Communication Services | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.7% | 10.0% |
| Industrials | 9.4% | 8.9% |
| Other Sectors | 22.1% | 23.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHK | +3.4% | +14.4% | +23.6% | +21.2% | +12.7% | — | 1.00% |
| BKLC | +3.3% | +14.0% | +23.5% | +22.2% | +13.6% | — | 1.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHK vs BKLC →
Shared Holdings(493)
The top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
7.29% | 7.53% | 7.29% | |
6.51% | 6.31% | 6.31% | |
4.75% | 4.83% | 4.75% | |
3.75% | 4.08% | 3.75% | |
3.14% | 3.62% | 3.14% | |
3.01% | 3.13% | 3.01% | |
2.50% | 3.11% | 2.50% | |
1.96% | 2.14% | 1.96% | |
1.74% | 1.78% | 1.74% | |
1.24% | 1.28% | 1.24% | |
1.15% | 1.37% | 1.15% | |
1.24% | 1.04% | 1.04% | |
1.55% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
1.19% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
0.86% | 1.05% | 0.86% | |
0.78% | 0.90% | 0.78% | |
0.77% | 0.89% | 0.77% | |
0.72% | 0.92% | 0.72% | |
0.77% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.60% | 0.73% | 0.60% | |
0.68% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.58% | 0.67% | 0.58% | |
0.57% | 0.65% | 0.57% | |
0.55% | 0.60% | 0.55% | |
0.56% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
Showing the top 250 of 493 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHK and BKLC overlap?
SCHK and BKLC overlap by 90.4% of portfolio weight. They share 493 holdings (SCHK holds 986 positions and BKLC holds 505), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHK and BKLC?
The two portfolios are 90.4% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHK and BKLC?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 40% of the total overlap.
What does SCHK own that BKLC doesn't?
493 positions (6.6% of SCHK) are unique to SCHK, led by NXPI, CCL and RVMD. In the other direction, 12 positions (0.4% of BKLC) are unique to BKLC.