SCZ vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are SCZ and IPAC?
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 1103 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 20.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 20.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1103SCZ holds 2044 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCZ 51%·IPAC 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCZ
941 of 2044 positions (48.2% of the fund) are not held by IPAC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCZ vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(1103)
The top 10 shared positions account for 6% of the overlap, led by 5801, 4004 and 5706.
0.50% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.44% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.43% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.39% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.26% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
| AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR | 0.14% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
0.23% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.22% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.22% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.22% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.22% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.22% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.21% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.21% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.20% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.20% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.19% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.19% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.19% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.18% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.18% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.18% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.18% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.17% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.17% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Showing the top 250 of 1103 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCZ and IPAC overlap?
SCZ and IPAC overlap by 20.4% of portfolio weight. They share 1103 holdings (SCZ holds 2044 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCZ and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 20.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCZ and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 5801, 4004, 5706, PLS and BSL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 6% of the total overlap.
What does SCZ own that IPAC doesn't?
941 positions (48.2% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ, led by DPLM, ENLT and BEZ. In the other direction, 272 positions (78.8% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.