SCZ vs VSS: Holdings Overlap
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
VSSVanguard FTSE All-world Ex-us Small-cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 4810 holdings · $11.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are SCZ and VSS?
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044 positions; Vanguard FTSE All-world Ex-us Small-cap Index Fund (VSS, by Vanguard) holds 4810. They have 1316 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 46.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 46.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1316SCZ holds 2044 · VSS holds 4810
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCZ 49%·VSS 48%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCZ
728 of 2044 positions (49.9% of the fund) are not held by VSS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
| VSS | +3.4% | +11.3% | +19.8% | +15.6% | +6.0% | +8.0% | 3.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCZ vs VSS →
Shared Holdings(1316)
The top 10 shared positions account for 5% of the overlap, led by ACLN, GTT and GAW.
0.28% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.25% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.22% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.20% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.20% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.19% | 0.17% | |
0.18% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.16% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.17% | 0.15% | |
0.16% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.19% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.15% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Showing the top 250 of 1316 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCZ and VSS overlap?
SCZ and VSS overlap by 46.7% of portfolio weight. They share 1316 holdings (SCZ holds 2044 positions and VSS holds 4810), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCZ and VSS?
The two portfolios are 46.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCZ and VSS?
The largest positions held by both funds are ACLN, GTT, GAW, SUBC and NKT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 5% of the total overlap.
What does SCZ own that VSS doesn't?
728 positions (49.9% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ, led by 5801, 4004 and 5706. In the other direction, 3494 positions (51.1% of VSS) are unique to VSS.