SCZ vs XT: Holdings Overlap
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are SCZ and XT?
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044 positions; iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219. They have 26 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 26SCZ holds 2044 · XT holds 219
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCZ 2%·XT 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCZ
2018 of 2044 positions (97.3% of the fund) are not held by XT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCZ vs XT →
Shared Holdings(26)
The top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the overlap, led by PLS, MIN and 6506.
0.39% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.23% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.22% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.09% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.05% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.07% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| Euro | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
0.06% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.14% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.10% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.08% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| NORWEGIAN KRONE | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| DANISH KRONER | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| Megaport Ltd | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| SINGAPORE DOLLARS | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWEDISH KRONE | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ISRAELI SHEKEL | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCZ and XT overlap?
SCZ and XT overlap by 0.9% of portfolio weight. They share 26 holdings (SCZ holds 2044 positions and XT holds 219), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCZ and XT?
The two portfolios are 0.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCZ and XT?
The largest positions held by both funds are PLS, MIN, 6506, IGO and CDA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the total overlap.
What does SCZ own that XT doesn't?
2018 positions (97.3% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ, led by 5801, 4004 and 5706. In the other direction, 193 positions (98.8% of XT) are unique to XT.