SMH vs TDIV: Holdings Overlap
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
First Trust · 95 holdings · $4.4B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are SMH and TDIV?
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25 positions; First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV, by First Trust) holds 95. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 29.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 29.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13SMH holds 25 · TDIV holds 95
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SMH 52%·TDIV 33%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SMH
12 of 25 positions (48.0% of the fund) are not held by TDIV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SMH | TDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.9% | 80.7% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 14.1% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 2.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of SMH, 3% of TDIV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
| TDIV | +4.3% | +21.7% | +31.1% | +27.8% | +17.1% | +17.5% | 1.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SMH vs TDIV →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the overlap, led by AVGO, TXN and QCOM.
7.79% | 8.09% | 7.79% | |
4.61% | 7.64% | 4.61% | |
4.09% | 3.78% | 3.78% | |
11.84% | 3.77% | 3.77% | |
4.70% | 2.50% | 2.50% | |
4.59% | 1.88% | 1.88% | |
4.74% | 1.36% | 1.36% | |
1.24% | 1.29% | 1.24% | |
1.00% | 1.23% | 1.00% | |
4.99% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
1.23% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.21% | 0.55% | 0.21% | |
0.90% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SMH and TDIV overlap?
SMH and TDIV overlap by 29.5% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (SMH holds 25 positions and TDIV holds 95), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SMH and TDIV?
The two portfolios are 29.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SMH and TDIV?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, TXN, QCOM, TSM and ADI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the total overlap.
What does SMH own that TDIV doesn't?
12 positions (48.0% of SMH) are unique to SMH, led by NVDA, AMD and LRCX. In the other direction, 82 positions (66.4% of TDIV) are unique to TDIV.