SMH vs VGT: Holdings Overlap
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
VGTVanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Vanguard · 317 holdings · $147.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (SMH: 2026-03-31, VGT: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SMH and VGT?
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25 positions; Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund (VGT, by Vanguard) holds 317. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 40.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 40.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21SMH holds 25 · VGT holds 317
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SMH 81%·VGT 41%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SMH
4 of 25 positions (18.5% of the fund) are not held by VGT.
Only in VGT
296 of 317 positions (59.0% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SMH | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.9% | 99.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
| VGT | +6.5% | +29.2% | +40.8% | +31.3% | +19.3% | +24.7% | 0.36% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SMH vs VGT →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MU.
19.64% | 16.82% | 16.82% | |
7.79% | 4.21% | 4.21% | |
4.23% | 4.20% | 4.20% | |
4.68% | 3.21% | 3.21% | |
4.34% | 2.03% | 2.03% | |
4.60% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
4.59% | 1.40% | 1.40% | |
4.61% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
4.09% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
4.74% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
4.70% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
2.35% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
2.43% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
2.50% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.24% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.23% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.44% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.41% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.60% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.00% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.21% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SMH and VGT overlap?
SMH and VGT overlap by 40.9% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (SMH holds 25 positions and VGT holds 317), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SMH and VGT?
The two portfolios are 40.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SMH and VGT?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MU, AMD and INTC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does SMH own that VGT doesn't?
4 positions (18.5% of SMH) are unique to SMH, led by TSM, ASML and STM. In the other direction, 296 positions (59.0% of VGT) are unique to VGT.