SMH vs XT: Holdings Overlap
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (SMH: 2026-03-31, XT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SMH and XT?
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25 positions; iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12SMH holds 25 · XT holds 219
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SMH 56%·XT 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SMH
13 of 25 positions (43.9% of the fund) are not held by XT.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SMH | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.9% | 42.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 23.2% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.2% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 5.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 10.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of SMH, 2% of XT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SMH vs XT →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by TXN, NVDA and ADI.
 TXNTexas Instruments Inc. COM | 4.61% | 5.04% | 4.61% |
|---|---|---|---|
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 19.64% | 4.01% | 4.01% |
 ADIAnalog Devices Inc. COM | 4.70% | 3.99% | 3.99% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.79% | 2.23% | 2.23% |
 NXPINXP Semiconductors NV EUR0.20 | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.24% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 4.23% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 4.68% | 0.71% | 0.71% |
 ONON Semiconductor Corp. COM | 0.60% | 0.83% | 0.60% |
 MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc. COM | 1.23% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 MRVLMarvell Technology Inc COM | 2.35% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 2.43% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 2.50% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SMH and XT overlap?
SMH and XT overlap by 18.8% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (SMH holds 25 positions and XT holds 219), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SMH and XT?
The two portfolios are 18.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SMH and XT?
The largest positions held by both funds are TXN, NVDA, ADI, AVGO and NXPI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does SMH own that XT doesn't?
13 positions (43.9% of SMH) are unique to SMH, led by TSM, ASML and KLAC. In the other direction, 207 positions (80.1% of XT) are unique to XT.