SPHQ vs SPMO: Holdings Overlap
SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Invesco · 99 holdings · $20.0B · as of 2026-04-30
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Invesco · 99 holdings · $21.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (SPHQ: 2026-04-30, SPMO: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SPHQ and SPMO?
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ, by Invesco) holds 99 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO, by Invesco) holds 99. They have 25 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 25SPHQ holds 99 · SPMO holds 99
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SPHQ 41%·SPMO 22%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SPHQ
74 of 99 positions (59.1% of the fund) are not held by SPMO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SPHQ | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 27.6% | 54.9% |
| Industrials | 24.5% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Staples | 15.3% | 4.0% |
| Financials | 13.4% | 5.7% |
| Communication Services | 2.0% | 8.8% |
| Other Sectors | 17.0% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHQ | -0.8% | +15.3% | +21.9% | +19.9% | +12.7% | +14.6% | 1.09% |
| SPMO | +0.2% | +26.0% | +29.7% | +39.1% | +20.9% | +20.0% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SPHQ vs SPMO →
Shared Holdings(25)
The top 10 shared positions account for 83% of the overlap, led by LRCX, CAT and CSCO.
4.09% | 3.54% | 3.54% | |
3.78% | 2.60% | 2.60% | |
3.54% | 2.02% | 2.02% | |
2.79% | 1.77% | 1.77% | |
2.15% | 1.77% | 1.77% | |
4.16% | 1.64% | 1.64% | |
3.27% | 1.39% | 1.39% | |
3.15% | 1.33% | 1.33% | |
3.33% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
1.22% | 1.10% | 1.10% | |
2.27% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
0.82% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
1.05% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.08% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.66% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.46% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.61% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.66% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.47% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.21% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.22% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.20% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.20% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.18% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.15% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SPHQ and SPMO overlap?
SPHQ and SPMO overlap by 22.1% of portfolio weight. They share 25 holdings (SPHQ holds 99 positions and SPMO holds 99), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SPHQ and SPMO?
The two portfolios are 22.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SPHQ and SPMO?
The largest positions held by both funds are LRCX, CAT, CSCO, AMAT and WDC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 83% of the total overlap.
What does SPHQ own that SPMO doesn't?
74 positions (59.1% of SPHQ) are unique to SPHQ, led by COST, V and AAPL. In the other direction, 74 positions (78.0% of SPMO) are unique to SPMO.