SPMD vs IJH: Holdings Overlap
SPMDState Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 399 holdings · $18.5B · as of 2026-08-06
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (SPMD: 2026-08-06, IJH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SPMD and IJH?
State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF (SPMD, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 399 positions; iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399. They have 384 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 89.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 89.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 384SPMD holds 399 · IJH holds 399
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SPMD 100%·IJH 96%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SPMD
15 of 399 positions (5.2% of the fund) are not held by IJH.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SPMD | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 26.0% | 25.3% |
| Financials | 16.1% | 14.6% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 12.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.7% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | 10.3% | 8.9% |
| Other Sectors | 25.8% | 27.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMD | +3.1% | +18.5% | +26.0% | +14.6% | +9.1% | +11.3% | 1.19% |
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SPMD vs IJH →
Shared Holdings(384)
The top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the overlap, led by FTI, CW and USFD.
0.76% | 0.87% | 0.76% | |
0.73% | 0.78% | 0.73% | |
0.65% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.63% | 0.71% | 0.63% | |
0.64% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.62% | 0.80% | 0.62% | |
0.84% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
0.76% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
0.60% | 0.67% | 0.60% | |
0.73% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.81% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.81% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.76% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.60% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
0.68% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
0.54% | 0.58% | 0.54% | |
0.61% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.53% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.59% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 0.54% | 0.49% | |
0.49% | 0.64% | 0.49% | |
0.54% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.47% | 0.56% | 0.47% | |
0.50% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.46% | 0.47% | 0.46% |
Showing the top 250 of 384 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SPMD and IJH overlap?
SPMD and IJH overlap by 89.2% of portfolio weight. They share 384 holdings (SPMD holds 399 positions and IJH holds 399), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SPMD and IJH?
The two portfolios are 89.2% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SPMD and IJH?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, CW, USFD, XPO and BURL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the total overlap.
What does SPMD own that IJH doesn't?
15 positions (5.2% of SPMD) are unique to SPMD, led by SN, SMTC and ROKU. In the other direction, 15 positions (3.5% of IJH) are unique to IJH.